ragz4u
02-04 09:28 AM
Many of us feel that a vast majority of the people affected by retrogression do not know
a) what retrogression is all about and how they are affected and
b) the existence of ImmigrationVoice.org to fight this evil
The NJ team has taken the initiative to make more people aware of the situation our organization. As part of this initiative, the NJ team will be distributing flyers to visitors of the Bridgewater temple today starting at 11.30 am.
If you would like to participate in activities like this, please feel free to start a thread for your state/district and other volunteers can pitch in
a) what retrogression is all about and how they are affected and
b) the existence of ImmigrationVoice.org to fight this evil
The NJ team has taken the initiative to make more people aware of the situation our organization. As part of this initiative, the NJ team will be distributing flyers to visitors of the Bridgewater temple today starting at 11.30 am.
If you would like to participate in activities like this, please feel free to start a thread for your state/district and other volunteers can pitch in
wallpaper Compaq Presario CQ56-
lc_kab_milega
01-08 01:13 PM
Permanent Program
For PERM, 73.8 percent of applications were processed within six months, exceeding the target
of 65 percent, though performance declined from the prior years. PERM performance was
affected by the reallocation of resources to eliminate an applications backlog in the H-2B
Temporary Non-agricultural Program. In FY 2008, the DOL will closely monitor
implementation of the Fraud Rule for impact upon PERM processing and redirect resources that
were used to eliminate the H-2B backlog to the PERM program as needed. Keeping these
factors in mind, the target for PERM application processing within six months will be 76% by
FY 2009.
For PERM, 73.8 percent of applications were processed within six months, exceeding the target
of 65 percent, though performance declined from the prior years. PERM performance was
affected by the reallocation of resources to eliminate an applications backlog in the H-2B
Temporary Non-agricultural Program. In FY 2008, the DOL will closely monitor
implementation of the Fraud Rule for impact upon PERM processing and redirect resources that
were used to eliminate the H-2B backlog to the PERM program as needed. Keeping these
factors in mind, the target for PERM application processing within six months will be 76% by
FY 2009.
bayarea07
07-18 03:58 PM
We would like to know on what does IV intend to work on for improving GC process in future
2011 compaq presario cq56-111sa
indianabacklog
06-20 08:13 AM
guys who have already filed 485.
Do u know if its possible to schedule an earlier fingerprinting date? can we just walk to a ASC with our appointment letter and get our fingerprinting done?
I filed for AOS at the beginning of May and had fingerprints done one month later. How quickly do you want them done?
Do u know if its possible to schedule an earlier fingerprinting date? can we just walk to a ASC with our appointment letter and get our fingerprinting done?
I filed for AOS at the beginning of May and had fingerprints done one month later. How quickly do you want them done?
more...
DrW00t
07-16 04:44 AM
HI all, I'm new to this.. i was just wondering is there any web sites where I can find out how to do stuff with swift and some tutorials..?!?!
~Drew
THANKYOU
~Drew
THANKYOU
rakesh_one
03-18 10:51 AM
No. OPT means in F1. As long as you register for enough credits, your status continues. The enough credits is determined by your international advisor.
more...
kirupa
07-11 04:36 PM
Added!
2010 hot compaq presario cq56-111sa
satyakb
03-16 08:41 PM
Hi Immigration Voice Team,
I would like to know your advice,
My details are
- EB3 / Labor filed and approved during July/2007
- I140 & I485 filed concurrently during August/2007
- I140 got approved on Jan/16/2009
- EAD Renewal is made and existing one is valid till Nov/2010
I have only labor number, 140 approval notice with me. where as I do not have labor complete job description.
As of now
- Can I change my employer without any labor job description?
- Does my employer has still rights to revoke I140?
- How can I change job to new employer and protect myself from I140 revoke by existing employer?
- GC filing expenses was completely bared by employer only.
Thanks & Regards,
Satyakb
I would like to know your advice,
My details are
- EB3 / Labor filed and approved during July/2007
- I140 & I485 filed concurrently during August/2007
- I140 got approved on Jan/16/2009
- EAD Renewal is made and existing one is valid till Nov/2010
I have only labor number, 140 approval notice with me. where as I do not have labor complete job description.
As of now
- Can I change my employer without any labor job description?
- Does my employer has still rights to revoke I140?
- How can I change job to new employer and protect myself from I140 revoke by existing employer?
- GC filing expenses was completely bared by employer only.
Thanks & Regards,
Satyakb
more...
ranand00
10-04 09:26 PM
my husband's h1 ext is approved.
my h1 to h4 cos is still pending. If we go to canda for his h1 stamping and my h4 stamping with my h4 filing papers ( i-539) and receipt notice and come back to usa with successfull stampings, how will uscis know that i travelled to a consulate and got h4 stamping done.
Will they still continue to process my h4.
Do i have to inform uscis after I come back to usa of my successful stamping.
what should I expect on my pending case once i come back.
Thanks
anand
my h1 to h4 cos is still pending. If we go to canda for his h1 stamping and my h4 stamping with my h4 filing papers ( i-539) and receipt notice and come back to usa with successfull stampings, how will uscis know that i travelled to a consulate and got h4 stamping done.
Will they still continue to process my h4.
Do i have to inform uscis after I come back to usa of my successful stamping.
what should I expect on my pending case once i come back.
Thanks
anand
hair compaq presario cq56-111sa
Saikrishna
08-15 03:51 PM
GUYS - PLEASE SAY YES TO RALLY AND TRY TO ATTEND
IV CORE TEAM HAVE ALREADY COMPLAINT THAT WE DONT HAVE MUCH PEOPLE TO SUPPORT THIS RALLY AS WELL.
FORGET ABOUT YOUR RECIEPT NOTICE NOW AND CONCENRATE ON THESE RALLY WHICH WILL GIVE US ULTIMATE BENEFIT TO GIVE US GREEN CARD.
OTHERWISE BE A BIG LOSER SEARCHING FOR YOUR RECIEPT NOTICE STATUS OR AP OR EAD STATUS.
aTTEND RALLY , BE POSTIVE AND ACHIEVE END-GOAL OF GETTING GREEN CARD BEFORE NEXT YEAR 2008.
AWAKE AWAKE UNTIL YOU REACH THE GOAL - SWAMI VIVEKANANDA
SUPPORT THE IV CORE TEAM RALLY AT WASHINGTON DC ON 18 SEPT:)
IV CORE TEAM HAVE ALREADY COMPLAINT THAT WE DONT HAVE MUCH PEOPLE TO SUPPORT THIS RALLY AS WELL.
FORGET ABOUT YOUR RECIEPT NOTICE NOW AND CONCENRATE ON THESE RALLY WHICH WILL GIVE US ULTIMATE BENEFIT TO GIVE US GREEN CARD.
OTHERWISE BE A BIG LOSER SEARCHING FOR YOUR RECIEPT NOTICE STATUS OR AP OR EAD STATUS.
aTTEND RALLY , BE POSTIVE AND ACHIEVE END-GOAL OF GETTING GREEN CARD BEFORE NEXT YEAR 2008.
AWAKE AWAKE UNTIL YOU REACH THE GOAL - SWAMI VIVEKANANDA
SUPPORT THE IV CORE TEAM RALLY AT WASHINGTON DC ON 18 SEPT:)
more...
zymorian
05-12 01:14 AM
err, any advice from anyone?? :rolleyes:
hot hp compaq presario cq56-111sa.
amitjoey
05-06 12:09 PM
I believe it is Page 8
http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/I-765instr.pdf
http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/I-765instr.pdf
more...
house hp compaq presario cq61-115.
neethsbhat
09-14 12:48 AM
My funny monster .
did in Illustrator.
hope u like it.
http://i880.photobucket.com/albums/ac8/Jellyfish103/oiii.jpg
hey.. its wonderful.. i liked ur's the most...
did in Illustrator.
hope u like it.
http://i880.photobucket.com/albums/ac8/Jellyfish103/oiii.jpg
hey.. its wonderful.. i liked ur's the most...
tattoo compaq presario cq56-111sa.
Didiusthegreat
10-19 08:51 AM
You can also export your movie from swift 3d (I have V2) with a white background, and then when you import that in Flash, there should be no background
more...
pictures compaq presario cq56-115dx
Vibes30
06-12 08:56 AM
.........This is not a warez board.......
.........Do not ask for or request software of any kind that may be construed as pirating.......
.........You have been warned.........
.........It is only a matter of time before upuat8 is all over this post........
.........Thank you for your immediate attention.......
.........Do not ask for or request software of any kind that may be construed as pirating.......
.........You have been warned.........
.........It is only a matter of time before upuat8 is all over this post........
.........Thank you for your immediate attention.......
dresses images HP Compaq Presario CQ56
deepakd
02-06 12:44 PM
Guys
Just want to know my options here and here is my scenario:
I am on H1-B and my 6 years of H1B is going to complete on March so I have almost 1 more year to complete my 6 years of h1-B
Right now, I have my LC and I-140 approved from my present employer.
Now, I am thinking about moving onto a new job where the new employer is ready to start my GC immediately I take the new job.
My question is:
If I take the new job, would I get my new H-1B for 3 years since my I-140 with old employer/current employer is already approved ?
I don't have the copy of my I-140 but I think I can get it.
Also, if I start the transfer to new employer, would I get 3 year H1B or just remaining 1 year out of 6 years ?
Thanks
DD
_________
Just want to know my options here and here is my scenario:
I am on H1-B and my 6 years of H1B is going to complete on March so I have almost 1 more year to complete my 6 years of h1-B
Right now, I have my LC and I-140 approved from my present employer.
Now, I am thinking about moving onto a new job where the new employer is ready to start my GC immediately I take the new job.
My question is:
If I take the new job, would I get my new H-1B for 3 years since my I-140 with old employer/current employer is already approved ?
I don't have the copy of my I-140 but I think I can get it.
Also, if I start the transfer to new employer, would I get 3 year H1B or just remaining 1 year out of 6 years ?
Thanks
DD
_________
more...
makeup compaq presario cq56-111sa
bos_guy
08-05 11:22 AM
I need some help with my immigration issues. I was wondering if anyone knew of a good lawyer that would be able to assist me? My issue is regarding H1B/ F1. As always any help is greatly appreciated.
girlfriend tattoo HP Compaq CQ56-101SA hp
Blog Feeds
11-30 03:00 AM
"In heated, election-year politics, the facts often take a backseat to campaign rhetoric - particularly when it comes to immigration. In an effort to defend the facts and provide basic answers to the most commonly asked questions, the Immigration Policy Center releases �Giving the Facts a Fighting Chance: Answers to the Toughest Immigration Questions (http://www.immigrationpolicy.org/sites/default/files/docs/Giving_Facts_a_Fighting_Chance_100710.pdf).� (PDF version)"
More... (http://ashwinsharma.com/2010/10/16/giving-facts-a-fighting-chance-answers-to-the-toughest-immigration-questions--via-the-immigration-policy-center.aspx?ref=rss)
More... (http://ashwinsharma.com/2010/10/16/giving-facts-a-fighting-chance-answers-to-the-toughest-immigration-questions--via-the-immigration-policy-center.aspx?ref=rss)
hairstyles hot compaq presario cq56-111sa compaq presario cq56-111sa. girlfriend
optimist578
01-17 04:36 PM
Can labor and I140 be filed from an employer, even if employee is not working for that employer currently, may be with the intention of joining that employer at later date? Please reply.
How about 485?
thanks.
Yes. GC processing is for a future job. So, labor and I-140 can certainly be filed without being on the payroll. I think I-485 also can be filed before joining the firm. But you should confirm this part from a lawyer.
How about 485?
thanks.
Yes. GC processing is for a future job. So, labor and I-140 can certainly be filed without being on the payroll. I think I-485 also can be filed before joining the firm. But you should confirm this part from a lawyer.
Macaca
08-05 08:12 AM
A Bad Deal Gets Worse (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/05/opinion/05sun2.html) August 5, 2007
President Bush is understandably desperate for some kind of foreign policy success. But that cannot justify sacrificing his principled stand against weapons proliferation to seal a nuclear cooperation deal with India. The agreement could end up benefiting New Delhi�s weapons program as much as its pursuit of nuclear power.
The deal was deeply flawed from the start. And it has been made even worse by a newly negotiated companion agreement that lays out the technical details for nuclear commerce. Congress should reject the agreement and demand that the administration, or its successor, negotiate a new one that does not undermine efforts to restrain the spread of nuclear weapons.
Any agreement needs to honor the principle Mr. Bush set forth in 2004: that countries do not need to make their own nuclear fuel, or reprocess their spent fuel, to operate effective nuclear energy programs. The technology can be all too easily diverted to make fuel for a nuclear weapon.
Unfortunately, Mr. Bush�s accord with India jettisoned that essential principle. Washington capitulated to India�s nuclear establishment and endorsed continued reprocessing. And while United States law calls for nuclear cooperation to end if India detonates another weapon, the agreement makes no explicit mention of that requirement � while it promises that Washington will acquiesce, if not assist, in India�s efforts to find other fuel suppliers.
Bringing India � which never signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty � in from the cold is not a bad idea. It is the world�s most populous democracy, with a dynamic economy. And its record on nonproliferation � aside from its own diversion of civilian technology to its once-secret weapons program � is pretty good. The problem is that the United States got very little back. No promise to stop producing bomb-making material. No promise not to expand its arsenal. And no promise not to resume nuclear testing.
The message of all this is unmistakable: When it comes to nuclear proliferation, Washington�s only real policy is to reward its friends and punish its enemies. Suspicion of America�s motives around the world are high enough. America cannot afford another such blow to its credibility, especially when it is trying to rally international pressure against nuclear programs in Iran and North Korea.
The administration will argue that altering this agreement now would be a slap at India. But there is no good in compounding a bad deal. And there are better ways to deepen political and economic ties.
Congress accepted the administration�s arguments far too uncritically when it approved the first India-related nuclear legislation last December. It must now take a stand against the even more damaging companion agreement. At a time when far too many governments are re-examining their decision to forswear nuclear weapons, the United States should be shoring up the nuclear rules, not shredding them.
President Bush is understandably desperate for some kind of foreign policy success. But that cannot justify sacrificing his principled stand against weapons proliferation to seal a nuclear cooperation deal with India. The agreement could end up benefiting New Delhi�s weapons program as much as its pursuit of nuclear power.
The deal was deeply flawed from the start. And it has been made even worse by a newly negotiated companion agreement that lays out the technical details for nuclear commerce. Congress should reject the agreement and demand that the administration, or its successor, negotiate a new one that does not undermine efforts to restrain the spread of nuclear weapons.
Any agreement needs to honor the principle Mr. Bush set forth in 2004: that countries do not need to make their own nuclear fuel, or reprocess their spent fuel, to operate effective nuclear energy programs. The technology can be all too easily diverted to make fuel for a nuclear weapon.
Unfortunately, Mr. Bush�s accord with India jettisoned that essential principle. Washington capitulated to India�s nuclear establishment and endorsed continued reprocessing. And while United States law calls for nuclear cooperation to end if India detonates another weapon, the agreement makes no explicit mention of that requirement � while it promises that Washington will acquiesce, if not assist, in India�s efforts to find other fuel suppliers.
Bringing India � which never signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty � in from the cold is not a bad idea. It is the world�s most populous democracy, with a dynamic economy. And its record on nonproliferation � aside from its own diversion of civilian technology to its once-secret weapons program � is pretty good. The problem is that the United States got very little back. No promise to stop producing bomb-making material. No promise not to expand its arsenal. And no promise not to resume nuclear testing.
The message of all this is unmistakable: When it comes to nuclear proliferation, Washington�s only real policy is to reward its friends and punish its enemies. Suspicion of America�s motives around the world are high enough. America cannot afford another such blow to its credibility, especially when it is trying to rally international pressure against nuclear programs in Iran and North Korea.
The administration will argue that altering this agreement now would be a slap at India. But there is no good in compounding a bad deal. And there are better ways to deepen political and economic ties.
Congress accepted the administration�s arguments far too uncritically when it approved the first India-related nuclear legislation last December. It must now take a stand against the even more damaging companion agreement. At a time when far too many governments are re-examining their decision to forswear nuclear weapons, the United States should be shoring up the nuclear rules, not shredding them.
ashkam
07-18 11:13 AM
yes, probably not, yes.
No comments:
Post a Comment